Does Clinical Data Qualify as “Big Data”?

Venu Mallarapu

I was at an Analyst conference last week where I met a couple of analysts (no pun intended :-) ) focused on Life Sciences who felt that “Big Data” is a tough sell in Life Sciences, except for Genomic Data. That made me think. I always associated “Big Data” with the size of the data sets running into Peta Bytes and Zetta Bytes. What I learned in my journey since then is that the characteristics of Big Data does not start and end with the Size.

This article on Mike 2.0 blog by Mr. Robert Hillard, a Deloitte Principal and an author, titled “It’s time for a new definition of big data” talks about why Big Data does not mean “datasets that grow so large that they become awkward to work with using on-hand database management tools” as defined by Wikipedia. He goes on to illustrate three different ways that data could be be considered “Big Data”. For more, please read the blog.

One quality he explained that is of interest to me is “the number of independent data sources, each with the potential to interact”. Why is it of interest to me? I think Clinical Data, in the larger context of Research & Development, Commercialization and Post Marketing Surveillance definitely fits this definition. As explained in one of my previous posts title “Can Clinical Data Integration on the Cloud be a reality?“, I explain the diversity of clinical data in the R&D context. Now imagine including the other data sources like longitudinal data (EMR/EHR, Claims etc.), Social Media, Pharmacovigilance so on and so forth, the complexity increases exponentially. Initiatives like Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) have already proven that there is value in looking into data other than the data that is collected through the controlled clinical trial process. Same thing applies to some of the initiatives going on with various sponsors and other organizations in terms of making meaningful use of data from social media and other sources. You might be interested in my other post titled “Social Media, Literature Search, Sponsor Websites – A Safety Source Data Integration Approach” to learn more about such approaches that are being actively pursued by some sponsors.

All in all, I think that the complexities involved in making sense of disparate data sets from multiple sources and analyzing them to make meaningful analysis and ensure the risks of medicinal products outweigh the benefits will definitely qualify Clinical Data as “Big Data”. Having said that, do I think that organizations would be after this any time soon? My answer would be NO. Why? The industry is still in the process of warming up to the idea. Also, Life Sciences organizations being very conservative, specially when dealing with Clinical Data which is considered Intellectual Property as well as all the compliance and regulatory requirements that goes with the domain, it is going to be a long time before it is adopted. This article titled “How to Be Ready for Big Data” by Mr. Thor Olavsrud on website outlines the current readiness and roadmap for adoption by the industry in general.

The next couple of years will see evolution of tools and technology surrounding ”Big Data” and definitely help organizations evolve their strategies which in turn will result in the uptick in adoption.

As always your feedback and comments are welcome.




Recommended for you:

13 Scary Statistics On Employee Engagement [INFOGRAPHIC]

Jacob Shriar

There is a serious problem with the way we work.

Most employees are disengaged and not passionate about the work they do. This is costing companies a ton of money in lost productivity, absenteeism, and turnover. It’s also harmful to employees, because they’re more stressed out than ever.

The thing that bothers me the most about it, is that it’s all so easy to fix. I can’t figure out why managers aren’t more proactive about this. Besides the human element of caring for our employees, it’s costing them money, so they should care more about fixing it. Something as simple as saying thank you to your employees can have a huge effect on their engagement, not to mention it’s good for your level of happiness.

The infographic that we put together has some pretty shocking statistics in it, but there are a few common themes. Employees feel overworked, overwhelmed, and they don’t like what they do. Companies are noticing it, with 75% of them saying they can’t attract the right talent, and 83% of them feeling that their employer brand isn’t compelling. Companies that want to fix this need to be smart, and patient. This doesn’t happen overnight, but like I mentioned, it’s easy to do. Being patient might be the hardest thing for companies, and I understand how frustrating it can be not to see results right away, but it’s important that you invest in this, because the ROI of employee engagement is huge.

Here are 4 simple (and free) things you can do to get that passion back into employees. These are all based on research from Deloitte.

1.  Encourage side projects

Employees feel overworked and underappreciated, so as leaders, we need to stop overloading them to the point where they can’t handle the workload. Let them explore their own passions and interests, and work on side projects. Ideally, they wouldn’t have to be related to the company, but if you’re worried about them wasting time, you can set that boundary that it has to be related to the company. What this does, is give them autonomy, and let them improve on their skills (mastery), two of the biggest motivators for work.

Employees feel overworked and underappreciated, so as leaders, we need to stop overloading them to the point where they can’t handle the workload.

2.  Encourage workers to engage with customers

At Wistia, a video hosting company, they make everyone in the company do customer support during their onboarding, and they often rotate people into customer support. When I asked Chris, their CEO, why they do this, he mentioned to me that it’s so every single person in the company understands how their customers are using their product. What pains they’re having, what they like about it, it gets everyone on the same page. It keeps all employees in the loop, and can really motivate you to work when you’re talking directly with customers.

3.  Encourage workers to work cross-functionally

Both Apple and Google have created common areas in their offices, specifically and strategically located, so that different workers that don’t normally interact with each other can have a chance to chat.

This isn’t a coincidence. It’s meant for that collaborative learning, and building those relationships with your colleagues.

4.  Encourage networking in their industry

This is similar to number 2 on the list, but it’s important for employees to grow and learn more about what they do. It helps them build that passion for their industry. It’s important to go to networking events, and encourage your employees to participate in these things. Websites like Eventbrite or Meetup have lots of great resources, and most of the events on there are free.

13 Disturbing Facts About Employee Engagement [Infographic]

What do you do to increase employee engagement? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!

Did you like today’s post? If so you’ll love our frequent newsletter! Sign up here and receive The Switch and Shift Change Playbook, by Shawn Murphy, as our thanks to you!

This infographic was crafted with love by Officevibe, the employee survey tool that helps companies improve their corporate wellness, and have a better organizational culture.


Recommended for you:

Supply Chain Fraud: The Threat from Within

Lindsey LaManna

Supply chain fraud – whether perpetrated by suppliers, subcontractors, employees, or some combination of those – can take many forms. Among the most common are:

  • Falsified labor
  • Inflated bills or expense accounts
  • Bribery and corruption
  • Phantom vendor accounts or invoices
  • Bid rigging
  • Grey markets (counterfeit or knockoff products)
  • Failure to meet specifications (resulting in substandard or dangerous goods)
  • Unauthorized disbursements

LSAP_Smart Supply Chains_graphics_briefook inside

Perhaps the most damaging sources of supply chain fraud are internal, especially collusion between an employee and a supplier. Such partnerships help fraudsters evade independent checks and other controls, enabling them to steal larger amounts. The median loss from fraud committed
by a single thief was US$80,000, according to the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE).

Costs increase along with the number of perpetrators involved. Fraud involving two thieves had a median loss of US$200,000; fraud involving three people had a median loss of US$355,000; and fraud with four or more had a median loss of more than US$500,000, according to ACFE.

Build a culture to fight fraud

The most effective method to fight internal supply chain theft is to create a culture dedicated to fighting it. Here are a few ways to do it:

  • Make sure the board and C-level executives understand the critical nature of the supply chain and the risk of fraud throughout the procurement lifecycle.
  • Market the organization’s supply chain policies internally and among contractors.
  • Institute policies that prohibit conflicts of interest, and cross-check employee and supplier data to uncover potential conflicts.
  • Define the rules for accepting gifts from suppliers and insist that all gifts be documented.
  • Require two employees to sign off on any proposed changes to suppliers.
  • Watch for staff defections to suppliers, and pay close attention to any supplier that has recently poached an employee.

About Lindsey LaManna

Lindsey LaManna is Social and Reporting Manager for the Digitalist Magazine by SAP Global Marketing. Follow @LindseyLaManna on Twitter, on LinkedIn or Google+.


Recommended for you:

What If Chelsea Manager Jose Mourinho Could Be Proved Right In Medical Staff Row?

Mark Goad

Big Data and the Internet of Things brings new level of insight to sports medicine

With the 2015-16 European football (soccer) season underway, we are already seeing the impact of the huge pressure to succeed. In some cases, it is boiling over even this early on, with Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho getting involved in a very public row with his medical staff over the treatment of Eden Hazard during a match. As the season builds momentum, all clubs know one of the most vital aspects of winning trophies is keeping the best players fit so they can play at the top of their game as often as possible.

Last season, just like in every season, we saw injuries that affected teams’ results and possibly their final standings at the end of the season, while other teams capitalized. Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger blamed injuries for the team’s failed title bid, while Real Madrid suffered injuries to players like Gareth Bale and Luka Modric at a crucial stage of the season and lost the title to Barcelona.

There’s no doubt that football clubs, especially the bigger teams, employ first-rate medical staff – physiotherapists, doctors, sports scientists, and so on – but they can only do so much to keep players off the treatment table. Players are human, after all, and keeping them injury-free for such long and grueling campaigns is a big ask. This season again will see players on the end of crunching tackles, over-exerting their bodies, and over-stretching.

What’s less talked about than lost games and league titles when discussing injuries is the salaries paid to injured players. The estimated average cost of player injuries in the top four professional football leagues in 2015 was $12.4 million* per team. Remarkably, every year teams lose an equivalent of 15%-30%** of their player payroll to injuries.

As salaries continue to rise, injuries are becoming just as much of an off-the-pitch boardroom issue as they are an on-the-pitch issue. Consider that if Barcelona’s Lionel Messi, the world’s highest-paid player, spends just a week out injured, the club still has to pay his weekly salary of around $1 million. Not only that, but there’s the huge potential for lost revenue from missing out on UEFA Champions League progress or domestic success because key players are out.

Just as winning seems to mean more than ever, so does football as a business. So with the spotlight firmly on “sweating the assets” – extracting maximum value from the entire squad – clubs are looking to Big Data and Internet of Things technology to consider how player injuries can be prevented with new levels of insight.

Prevention is better than cure

In July this year we saw what could be a huge landmark in the potential of monitoring the risk of injuries, when football’s international governing body FIFA announced its approval of wearable electronic performance and tracking systems during matches. As well as collecting data on statistics like distance covered and heart rate to determine decisions like substitution timings, this also paves the way for wearable satellite devices that keep medical staff updated on the likelihood of a player picking up an injury from over-exertion.

Emerging injury-risk monitoring software uses the concepts of Big Data and wearable technology to pull in and apply mathematical formulas to an exhaustive range of relevant data about players: fitness levels, recent levels of exertion, opponents, age, technique, hydration, even weather. This could help medical staff predict the risk of future injuries with much greater accuracy, allowing them to run simulations and take corrective actions in real time. Imagine a seemingly non-injured key player being substituted during a tightly contested match, only to find out afterwards that monitoring software had indicated he was at a high risk of pulling a muscle. This could very much be a part of the future of professional football.

Going back to Jose Mourinho and his reaction to the Chelsea medical staff running onto the pitch to treat Eden Hazard, it’s interesting to consider how in the future this kind of technology could either support or discredit his position in the dispute. It could help managers work more closely with physiotherapists, as they can visualize the data that shows the risk of injury to players. Although the pressure to win will likely keep on rising, the risk of expensive players injuries could see a big reduction.

SAP’s own injury risk monitoring software is currently in the proof-of-concept phase and will be entering development in the near future. The goal is to build IRM on the SAP Sports One platform as an additional component, and to provide integration to the existing modules of SAP Sports One solution. SAP Sports One was launched earlier this year and is the first sports-specific cloud solution powered by the SAP HANA platform, providing a single, unified platform for team management and performance optimization.

*Statistic calulated using 2015 Global Sports Salaries Survey

**Bleacher Report “Inside the 2014 Numbers of Each MLB Team’s Regular-Season Injury Impact” and NBA Injury Analysis


Mark Goad

About Mark Goad

Mark Goad, Value Advisory Associate, SAP Canada, is an experienced business analyst with industry coverage spanning telecommunications & retail, with a focus on digital business models. He specializes in synthesizing industry trends with a detailed analysis of client-specific data to help customers build out high-impact business & IT strategies. Outside of work, Mark volunteers as a lead management consultant for Junior Achievement of Central Ontario and contributes to a range of thought leadership publications.


Recommended for you:

How To Prepare Your IT Landscape For The Digital Economy

Sei Drake

Remember Tom Cruise’s 2002 movie Minority Report? Set in the futuristic world of 2054, the film featured self-driving cars, autonomous manufacturing robots, and multimedia advertising billboards that broadcast personalized messages to individuals as they passed by. What seemed like science fiction in 2002 is now a reality, with personalized and targeted social media and marketing, smart technologies such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and 3D printing – not to mention digital machine-to-machine hyperconnectivity of the Internet of Things (IoT). Digital transformation means that all of these things will become the norm in the next few years. The future of many enterprises will depend on their ability to embrace these technologies and innovations.

Over the last two decades, many companies have built large, complex IT landscapes to support traditional business processes. The legacy systems in these landscapes were not designed for the age of Internet hyperconnectivity and the resulting high data and transaction volumes. Extending these landscapes to support new, digitally connected processes and models will further complicate IT landscapes and inhibit business innovation and agility.

The architecture of the digital enterprise will not only need to support Big Data and analytics, but a host of other things. It must also use the datastream from evolving digital technologies to trigger actions and alerts in new and existing business processes, enabling increased revenue, improved customer experience, enhanced supply chain efficiencies, and innovative business models.

To keep pace with rapid change, businesses like yours need to do three things:

  1. Simplify your IT landscape.
  1. Transition to modern platforms such as cloud-based solutions and a “digital core.”
  1. Build innovative business solutions using the latest digital capabilities to  strategically differentiate from both current and future new competitors.

Yet most organizations lack the skills to tackle these tasks alone. So who can best help you navigate this shift? 

Support for a strong foundation 

Surprise! Your best choice may be the support organization of your enterprise software and solutions provider. Over the past 15 years, many enterprise support organizations have evolved beyond providing reactive break/fix support to acting as an architectural quality advisor that can oversee the complete software lifecycle. The support provider is a smart partner for both proactive landscape simplification and co-innovation initiatives.   That’s a fundamental shift driven by the market forces of this “new normal” of digital transformation.

Support providers tend to be close to their customers, understanding their existing technologies, business processes, and revenue models. And because software solution providers often lead in the introduction of new solutions based on the latest innovations and technologies – such as IoT, cloud, robotics, autonomous cars, and 3D printing – their experienced support teams can architect solutions that will give you a strategic and sustainable advantage over your competitors.

The proof is with customers. For example the Global Service & Support organization at SAP is working with a Fortune 100 chemical company on an IT simplification initiative. After numerous mergers and acquisitions over the years, this company needed help consolidating four unique IT landscapes into one. What is an overly complex, burdensome infrastructure will be a simplified, modern solution architecture.

SAP is also working with a large energy distribution company to co-engineer an innovative Big Data, IoT data management solution. The solution is structured to deliver fast, responsive analytics from a data store of 120 terabytes of smart meter data. The utility will use predictive analytics to anticipate demand, allowing buyers to make smarter wholesale energy purchases. In the future, this Big Data and analytics platform will be extended to support innovative solutions for the utility’s customers.

Minimize risk and maximize outcomes 

Working with support organizations to simplify and innovate offers clear benefits, too. These teams are naturally close to their development organizations. They understand cutting-edge technology and they have direct access to the best talent for building new solutions. Support organizations also have extensive experience working in high-volume, high-velocity transaction and data environments.

Because they already know your business and your technology infrastructure, partnering with your software and solutions support provider can reduce risk. Remember that support organizations are measured on their ability to help their customers succeed, not on maximizing billable hours. In a world of “outcomes-based” solutions, that’s a true win-win for all.

When building innovative solutions, support teams develop in short cycles, conduct proof-of-concept exercises, and take steps to minimize cost and risk. And they can do all of this while helping you continue supporting your traditional business operations, looking for opportunities to optimize processes, reduce costs, and increase efficiency.

We may not be able to predict what innovations and new technologies will exist in the year 2054, but we know that there are technology advancements available now that will have a significant impact on our world. Work with your enterprise software provider’s support organization and start planning your digital transformation.

Click here to learn more how Global Service & Support can provide support services to help you prepare for the digital economy and realize rich value.  Visit us at


About Sei Drake

Sei Drake has been helping SAP customers for over 18 years as a solutions expert and architecture advisor. In his current role as a Co-Engineering Architect in the Global Service and Support organization, he helps customers build innovative, industry leading capabilities with SAP technologies.

Recommended for you: