It wasn’t long ago that the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) swept over the American healthcare landscape, bringing with it a real focus on private exchanges. Consultants, brokers – and anyone with products to sell – were all focusing on these exchanges, which had a dramatic impact on both individuals and businesses of all sizes concerning the healthcare benefits afforded employees.
Fast forward to today.
Have private health exchanges lived up to the hype?
With the cost of healthcare on the rise, many companies in the United States have been trying to figure out how to cut those hefty employee insurance premiums. Businesses have responded in different ways, with some organizations eliminating coverage altogether.
Of course, that’s only an option for the smallest of businesses due to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) employer mandate and penalty, which go into effect this year.
Another response has been for companies to increase the deductible their employees must pay before employer-sponsored coverage kicks in. Still other organizations have turned to private health insurance exchanges, which emerged in the wake of the ACA as an insurance marketplace for employers.
Private health exchanges allow companies to control contributions while giving employees the ability to choose from different plans and find a policy that best fits their needs. The use of private health exchanges is an approach to employee benefits which has been thriving over the past few years.
In 2014, the private health exchange market included 2.5 million users. Last year, that number doubled. Industry analysts, such as consulting firms Accenture and Oliver Wyman, expect the market to grow to as many as 40 million users by 2018.
Private health exchanges offer a chance for employers to manage their costs and risks while giving employees control over their health coverage. But exchanges aren’t a revolutionary cure-all, either. To be the solution they could be, there’s still a lot of work to be done.
Private exchanges get mixed grades
According to a survey by the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, most employers who’ve made the switch from traditional benefit models to private health exchanges are happy with the result; just eight percent of those surveyed said they were dissatisfied with their experience. The majority of them saw their costs drop and say they now play a less active role in providing benefits that are comparable, if not of higher quality, to what employees had before.
One such example is Sears, which saved $38 million the first year after it made the switch, according to chief human resources officer Dean Carter. Not every organization can provide such a glowing review, however, and that‘s putting a damper on growth.
In fact, one industry expert gave the private health exchange model just passing grades last fall. Mike Smith, of Lockton Benefit Group, said cost savings need to improve to make a meaningful difference to employers. Smith noted that technology needs to work – and work well – for end users (i.e., HR administrators and employees), while platform providers need to offer fee structures that clearly define provider compensation. He also pointed out that right now private exchanges are still figuring things out while the marketplace continues to change.
Some platform providers are making their marks as respected leaders while others are merging with more successful players. New models from outliers, including benefits administrators and payroll companies such as ADP, may further change the way the private exchange marketplace evolves.
What does a private exchange platform need to get top marks?
With all the changes in the insurance market, it’s inevitable that there will be hits and misses. Some companies that have moved to private health exchanges haven’t seen the cost savings they expected; others have run into problems with service delivery models and little participation.
On the whole, however, private health exchanges are a good option with a lot of advantages. The ones that succeed will have some, if not all, of the following attributes:
- A forward-looking approach to the ACA. The ACA changes that will take effect this year are only the tip of the iceberg. Many employers are concerned about 2018 when a 40% tax – commonly referred to as the “Cadillac tax” – will be applied to what employers and employees jointly pay for coverage above a certain amount. Staying on top of these changes and offering compliance-driven products will set platforms above their competitors.
- A strong focus on technology. Multiple technological failures set the ACA program back when it launched in 2013. Our expectations as users are high; if a platform doesn’t work well, it won’t last. Exchanges with platforms that aren’t consistent, easy-to-use, and high-functioning will be passed over for more user-friendly options.
- Demonstrated compensation transparency. For the private exchange system to thrive, all stakeholders need to receive some value, and transparency of data and benefit will play a fundamental role in current and future success. Employers that want to stay on top of costs will gravitate toward providers that offer clear fee schedules and compensation information.
- Demonstrated administrator experience. Inexperience has been a stumbling block for private exchanges so far. Both benefits and exchange administrators may not have the industry experience or training needed to manage day-to-day operations of the exchange setup effectively. Better training and communication will drive successful relationships between employers and exchange providers in the years to come.
Right now, the private health exchange market is growing and becoming increasingly successful – but not as quickly as experts predicted five years ago. Of course, this doesn’t mean private health exchanges aren’t a solid option; it only means the industry needs more time to evaluate how the new model measures up.
For more on how digitalization is changing every type of business, see The Digital Economy: Disruption, Transformation, Opportunity.Comments