Machine Learning, Manufacturing, Production, And The OODA Loop

Sven Denecken

U.S. Air Force pilot and researcher John Boyd once proposed a model known as the OODA loop: Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Boyd suggested that two pilots locked in a battle would constantly need to observe what their opponent was doing, orient themselves in relation to their opponent’s tactical maneuvering, decide what they should do, and then act to counteract the opponent’s tactics. At the same time, the opponent would be doing the same thing. As a “loop,” this ballet would continue until one pilot could get “inside” of the opponent’s OODA loop and process enough information quicker than the opponent could react, and that pilot would typically win the fight.

In essence, this is what machine learning today is all about. The only difference is that we use computers to:

  1. Observe – collect the relevant data on a business process (data management, to us mere data mortals)
  1. Orient – develop an algorithm that will process the data and predict the likelihood of an optimal result (data science)
  1. Decide – Using predictive analytics, model and evaluate the alternatives and recommend a course of action
  1. Act – Execute a business process, transaction, or function to produce a business result

Once a cycle of this OODA loop has executed, the machine needs to re-observe the resultant micro-business environment, reevaluate the results of the action just taken (orient), and update its data and algorithms (decide and react).

Nowhere is this OODA loop of machine learning more obvious, tactical, and tangible than in the area of manufacturing and production processes. Take quality control, for example. In this highly simplified view of manufacturing quality control, first we detect a defect. How is the defect detected? It is observed. Perhaps a quality technician physically identifies the defect during a routine inspection. Alternatively, we could develop an automated process that uses sensors to identify the defect based on optical scans of the product or line-item tests of product standards (learn more about the Internet of Things). Next is orient. All relevant and significant information is recorded in a high-volume, high-speed database (Big Data and a data platform). A quality engineer then analyzes the root cause of the defect and makes a recommendation for actions to be taken to remediate the defect (decide). Finally, the quality engineer takes an action to correct the defect as well as what caused it (act), and the process repeats itself.

In this “loop,” machine learning can play a critical role:

  1. During the observe stage, an algorithm can be developed based on past defect history to look for certain very specific problems, but more importantly areas where problems might be. Think of the fighter pilot who knows what most average opponents would do in a tactical situation, as well as what an innovative opponent might do. Further, if this set of actions has been recorded and can be observed in a fraction of an instant, we have an opportunity to get inside that opponent (or strategic competitor’s) decision loop.
  1. During the orient stage, machine learning could be used to cycle through all of the known root causes for a specific defect, or even to be on the lookout for clues to potential new causes.
  1. Machine learning can be used during the decide phase to dynamically learn. Or it can be used to constantly expand the universe of potential courses of action while using analytics to create predictive models of the possibilities of success of alternative remediation strategies as business conditions continue to expand.
  1. Once we make our QC decision and act, that action goes into our history of actions, and we can assess the results of our actions to repeat this learning cycle.

By using machine learning and the OODA loop, we can now accelerate decision-making and respond more effectively and more rapidly not only to our own quality issues, but to understand our own quality control environment in the context of our competitors. Once we can observe, orient, decide, and act on all of the variables in our manufacturing and production environment – faster and with better information than our competitors – quality control can become a strategic lever. We can use it against our competitors who are no longer able to out-innovate, out-produce, or out-QC our operations.

In the next blog in this series, we will look into what it takes to start a program of machine learning. What kind of data do I need? Who processes all of this data? Am I staffed properly for this type of effort? What sort of infrastructure will I need to build this framework?

This will help us get inside of our competitor’s OODA loop.

Share your thoughts with me here, or on Twitter @SDenecken.  

To develop a strategy that will change the basis of competition in your industry, see Why Machine Learning and Why Now?

This article originally appeared on SAP Community and is republished by permission.


Sven Denecken

About Sven Denecken

Sven Denecken is Senior Vice President, Product Management and Co-Innovation of SAP S/4HANA, at SAP. His experience working with customers and partners for decades and networking with the SAP field organization and industry analysts allows him to bring client issues and challenges directly into the solution development process, ensuring that next-generation software solutions address customer requirements to focus on business outcome and help customers gain competitive advantage. Connect with Sven on Twitter @SDenecken or e-mail at sven.denecken@sap.com.